Daniel 11      The Ultimate Prophecy

Rev. David Holwick   P                                Book of Daniel, #10

First Baptist Church

Ledgewood, New Jersey

May 4, 2008

Daniel 11:2-4,21-23,31-38


THE ULTIMATE PROPHECY



  I. Rubbing the crystal ball.

      A. Actual predictions by intelligent people.


         "The horse is here to stay, but the automobile is only a

            novelty, a fad."

           -- President of Michigan Savings Bank advising against

                investing in Ford Motor Co., 1903.


         "No flying machine will ever fly from New York to Paris."

           -- Orville Wright


         "A rocket will never be able to leave earth's atmosphere."

           -- New York Times, 1936.


         "This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously

            considered as a means of communication.  The device is

               inherently of no value to us."

           -- Western Union internal memo, 1876.


         "The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value.

             Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?"

           -- David Sarnoff's associates in response to his urgings for

                investment in the radio in the 1920's.


         "Television won't be able to hold on to any market it captures

            after the first six months.  People will soon get tired of

               staring at a plywood box every night."

           -- Darryl F. Zanuck, head of 20th Century Fox, 1946.


         "Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons."

           -- Popular Mechanics, forecasting the relentless march of

                science, 1949


         "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."

           -- Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943

                                                                    #4410


      B. How well can God predict?

          1) Born again Christians take it as an article of faith that

                God has not only determined the future of Planet Earth,

                  he has also revealed important details of the future.

          2) Yet when Christians try to pinpoint these details, they

                have usually failed miserably.

              a) Hal Lindsey, Harold Camping, et. al.


                   

      C. The most precise prophecy in the entire Bible.

          1) Nobody disputes that Daniel 11 gives a blow-by-blow account

                of events in the third- and second-centuries B.C.

              a) Alexander the Great is mentioned.

              b) Cleopatra.

              c) The revolt of the Maccabean Jews.

          2) Commentators have differed on some details, but the major

                points are agreed upon.


      D. Too good to be true?

          1) It is so exact, even ancient commentators (pagans) assumed

                events were "predicted" after they had already occurred.

              a) Scholars call this a "pious fraud."

              b) The writer meant well, but he was faking it.

          2) Almost all liberal Bible scholars accept this view of Daniel.


      E. But God knows the future, and controls the future.

          1) Even when our world is in turmoil, we can trust in God.

          2) Dark days are coming, but God's kingdom will overcome.


II. I can spare you most of the details.

      A. Literally dozens of kings and events are predicted.

          1) One estimate is that there are 125 specific predictions in

                the first 35 verses!

          2) The fourth Persian king would be Xerxes.                11:2

          3) The mighty king in verse 3 is Alexander the Great.

              a) Daniel says "he will do what he pleases" and Alexander's

                    contemporaries agreed 100%.                      11:3

                  1> It is said that Alexander wept after his final

                        victory because there was nothing else to

                           conquer in the world.

              b) Despite his accomplishments, Daniel sees that Alexander

                    operated under God's limitations.

                  1> In chapter 8, verse 22, Alexander is called a

                        broken horn.

                  2> As the verse 4 mentions, he had no surviving heirs,

                        so his empire was divided between four generals.


      B. The essence of this chapter is a struggle between two kingdoms.

          1) The northern kingdom is the Seleucids (Syria).

          2) The southern kingdom is the Ptolemies (Egypt).

              a) Both of them were offshoots of Alexander's empire.

              b) Most of the kings were named Antiochus or Ptolemy.

                  1> You get IIs and IIIs and IVs and so on.

                  2> I can't keep them straight myself.


III. The rise of an especially evil king.                           11:21

      A. The ultimate king of the north - Antiochus IV (Epiphanes).

          1) He ruled in Syria from 175 to 164 B.C.

          2) He invaded Jerusalem and looted the temple of its treasure.

          3) He then attacked the Jewish religion.

              a) First he plotted with some of the Greek-oriented Jews

                    in order to divide them from the more religious ones.

              b) Next he attacked the religious Jews.

                  1> He slaughtered the inhabitants of Jerusalem.

                  2> He abolished the daily sacrifices.

                  3> He defiled the sanctuary by setting up a statue of

                        Zeus.  (Or, he slaughtered a pig there.)

                  4> Daniel calls this "the abomination that causes

                        desolation."                                11:31

              c) This is the period known as the Maccabean revolt.

                  1> Many Jews abandoned their faith, but some

                        remained true.                              11:35

                  2> One family, the Maccabees, led the revolt that

                        resulted in Israel's independence, something

                           they would not experience again until 1948.

                  3> Their rededication of the temple became the

                        festival of Hannukah.


      B. Beyond Antiochus.

          1) Verse 36 seems to go beyond the human Antiochus.

              a) The New Testament uses this same language to describe

                    the Antichrist, the ultimate human enemy of God.

              b) Paul's description of him in 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4 --


                 "Don't let anyone deceive you in any way, for that

                    day will not come until the rebellion occurs

                       and the man of lawlessness is revealed,

                          the man doomed to destruction.

                  He will oppose and will exalt himself over

                     everything that is called God or is worshiped,

                        so that he sets himself up in God's temple,

                           proclaiming himself to be God."

          2) The events in ch. 11 don't match Antiochus' life here.

              a) Liberals - this is because author is really predicting

                    here and he doesn't get it right.

              b) Conservatives - author is predicting distant future,

                    not of Antiochus, but the Antichrist.

                  1> The time in view, "that time," seems to be related

                        to the final resurrection.

                  2> The solution hinges on our view of God and the

                        Bible.


      C. Fact or fiction?  The argument of literary genre.

          1) Liberals argue Daniel is a literary fiction.

              a) It was not intended to be taken as historical fact.

              b) The Bible contains a variety of literary genres.

                  1> For example, everyone agrees that Jesus' parables

                        don't have to be taken as historical fact.

                  2> Liberals apply this principle to the prophetic

                        books.

                      A> Prophetic books like Daniel do not describe a

                            literal future.

                      B> These things are not going to happen.


                  According to Robert Anderson, author of one of the

                     commentaries I used, most early Christian writers

                        said today's passage was about the Antichrist.


                  Anderson writes:


                  "Though this has been a tenacious interpretation

                      over the centuries, it now has minimal appeal

                         beyond the circle of some sects....

                   There would be almost general scholarly agreement

                      with di Lella that such a view is 'exegetically

                         witless and religiously worthless'."          [1]


          2) Conservatives see literary genre abused in Daniel's case.

              a) The special pleading is really a denial of supernatural.

              b) Inspiration of Scripture itself is at stake.

                  1> The Virgin Birth, resurrection of Jesus, and other

                        miracles can also be dismissed as literary genres.

                  2> But the New Testament treats the supernatural in

                        Daniel as historical.  (cf. Heb 11:33-34)

                  3> Jesus himself treats the "abomination of desolation"

                        as a real person and a future event.      Matt 24


IV. The Antichrist is a key figure in Bible prophecy.

      A. Rather than being "witless and worthless," he is described

            by Jesus, Paul, and John (in his letters and Revelation).


      B. What Jesus says in Matthew 24:


          7 Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against

               kingdom.

            There will be famines and earthquakes in various places.

          8 All these are the beginning of birth pains.

          9 "Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put

               to death,

            and you will be hated by all nations because of me.

         10 At that time many will turn away from the faith and

               will betray and hate each other,


         14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the

               whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then

                  the end will come.

         15 "So when you see standing in the holy place 'the

               abomination that causes desolation,' spoken of through

                  the prophet Daniel--let the reader understand--

         16 then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains.

         21 For then there will be great distress, unequaled from

               the beginning of the world until now--and never to be

                  equaled again.


          1) Note the parallels with Daniel 11 - persecution,

                apostasy, Antichrist, conflict.


      C. John's teaching in Revelation 13:


          5  The beast was given a mouth to utter proud words and

               blasphemies and to exercise his authority for

                  forty-two months.

          6  He opened his mouth to blaspheme God, and to slander

                his name and his dwelling place and those who live

                   in heaven.

          7  He was given power to make war against the saints and

                to conquer them.  And he was given authority over

                   every tribe, people, language and nation.

          8  All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast--

                all whose names have not been written in the book

                   of life belonging to the Lamb that was slain

                      from the creation of the world.


          1) Similar parallels: blasphemy, war against saints,

                conflict between evil and good.


  V. Features of the antichrist in Daniel 11.

      A. He strives to be personally autonomous.                    11:36

          1) Echoes "you will be like God" from Garden of Eden.

          2) Our culture values this, too.

              a) Individualism, independence.

              b) The Bible values dependence on God.


      B. He blasphemes God and is cruel to people.                  11:36

          1) Most of us don't curse God, at least out loud.

          2) However, the way we live can have the same effect.

              a) In Romans 2, Paul says the corrupt behavior of God's

                    people causes Gentiles to blaspheme God.     Rom 2:24

              b) Has YOUR life caused someone else to turn from God?


      C. He believes might makes right.                             11:38

          1) The Antichrist honors "the god of fortresses."

          2) As the book of Revelation says about him, "who can make

                war with him?"

          3) Invincibility is a very big plus for us.  It is also

                a sham.

              a) Evangelical Manifesto on political involvement released

                    this week - we are depending too much on politics,

                       neglecting God.


VI. The Antichrist is defeated spiritually rather than militarily.

      A. In the New Testament, Jesus defeats Antichrist with the

            breath of his mouth.       2 Thess 2:8; compare Rev 19:13

          1) Even the sword that comes from his mouth (Rev 19) actually

                represents the Word of God.

          2) The battle of Armageddon is over before it starts and

                the Lord Jesus prevails.


      B. Prayer, not speculation.

          1) For centuries there has been speculation on who the

                Antichrist is.

              a) A few of the suggestions:


                  Roman Emperor Nero


                  Napoleon


                  Adolph Hitler


                  Joseph Stalin


                  John F. Kennedy


                  Saddam Hussein


                  Bill Clinton


                  George W. Bush


                  Barney the Dinosaur (There are actually websites

                     devoted to this theory.  It has something to do

                     with the red dragon of Revelation 12.)           [2]


              b) So far, none of these has panned out.

              c) But the identity of the Antichrist is not why the

                    prophecies in Daniel 11 were revealed.

          2) The reason for this chapter is to encourage prayer and trust.

              a) It was given in answer to Daniel's prayer.

              b) It is an encouragement to our prayer.

                  1> No matter how dark your life seems, God has not

                        forgotten you.

                  2> He has plans for you, and they are good plans.

                  3> Put your trust in him, and serve him with confidence.



=========================================================================

SOURCES FOR ILLUSTRATIONS USED IN THIS SERMON:


Much of this outline is derived from Sinclair Ferguson's commentary on

Daniel.  [see detailed outline below]


[1] Robert A. Anderson, INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMENTARY: SIGNS AND

      WONDERS, A COMMENTARY ON THE BOOK OF DANIEL (Eerdmans: Grand Rapids,

      MI, 1984), p. 141.  His quote is from di Lella's commentary on

      Daniel, page 303.


[2] Dr. Ray Pritchard, "Who is the Antichrist?", pastor of Calvary

      Memorial Church; Oak Park, Illinois; Keep Believing Ministries:

      http://www.calvarycrossroads.com.  Preached March 19, 2000.

      Kerux sermon #26429


#4410  "Lousy Predications From Famous People."  Author unknown.

          Abe Kudra Collection.


These and 30,000 others are part of the Kerux database that can be

downloaded, absolutely free, at http://www.holwick.com/database.html

=========================================================================



Sinclair Ferguson, MASTERING THE OLD TESTAMENT: DANIEL  (Word: 1988)


  I. Details in vision are only thinly veiled and there is wide

        agreement among commentators about the history to which it points.

      A. Major question: can we seriously believe Daniel received it as

            prophecy?

          1) Liberals almost universally say "no."

              a) Daniel was written as a tract for the times, to

                    encourage Jews during Maccabean persecution.

              b) The message is to encourage them that God is the Lord

                    of history.

          2) Conservatives mostly say "yes."

              a) If God can deliver from the mouth of lions, he can

                    predict the future.

              b) To say otherwise is to agree with Nebuchadnezzar:

                    "There is no god who can deliver men."  Dan 3:15

      B. What is at stake.

          1) Does God really rule history, and can he communicate the

                future to us?

      C. The argument of literary genre.

          1) Liberals argue Daniel is a literary fiction and was not

                intended to be taken as historical fact.

              a) The Bible contains a variety of literary genres.

                  1> For example, parables are not meant to be taken as

                        historical fact.

              b) Some conservatives have no problem with ascribing

                    Ecclesiastes to someone other than Solomon.

          2) Conservatives see literary genre abused in Daniel's case.

              a) The special pleading is really a denial of supernatural.

              b) Inspiration of Scripture itself is at stake.

                  1> Virgin birth, resurrection of Jesus, and other

                        miracles can also be dismissed as literary

                           genres.

                  2> It is important to look at the presuppositions that

                        underlie the study of genre.

                  3> The New Testament treats the supernatural in Daniel

                        as historical.  (cf. Heb 11:33-34)

II. How to approach these chapters.

      A. Two characteristics of prophecies in Daniel.

          1) Focus goes from broad vision of future to zoom in on

                details of one specific period.

          2) The kingdoms of God and the world are portrayed in a

                permanent state of conflict.

              a) Visions of intermediate conflict merge into visions

                    of final conflict.  Difficult to untangle.

III. Persia and Greece.      11:2-4

      A. Xerxes.

      B. Mighty king = Alexander.

          1) Contemporaries thought he could do what he wanted.

          2) Daniel sees that he operated under God's limitations.

      C. Wars of aggression.

IV. Vile person - Antiochus Epiphanes (175-164 BC) and the antichrist.

      A. From Syria.

      B. Invaded Jerusalem and looted the temple.

      C. Plotted with hellenistic Jews, then massacred the city.

          1) Sanctuary defiled, daily sacrifices abolished, image of

                Zeus was set up.  (abomination of desolation)

      D. Many Jews apostatized, some did not.

  V. The chapter is more than ancient history.

      A. Teaches that studying the Bible is hard work.   2 Tim 2:15

      B. Prophecy fills us with reverence for the wonders of God's word.

VI. Four profitable lessons.

      A. The kingdoms of the earth will always be unstable.

          1) Their gods are also unstable.

      B. Antiochus succeeded by plotting with and dividing the Jews.

          1) Evil cannot gain a foothold until it finds a foothold among

                the people of God.

      C. God's people should be encouraged.  Evil is doomed to

            destruction.

      D. God works out his purpose for us in all the circumstances of

            life.

VII. The antichrist.

      A. Passage beginning with verse 36 carries on from Antiochus.

          1) New character (antichrist) or same old one?

          2) But events no longer match Antiochus' life.

              a) Liberals - this is because author is really predicting

                    here and he doesn't get it right.

              b) Conservatives - author is predicting distant future,

                    not of Antiochus, but antichrist.

                  1> The king in view is more wicked than any figure

                        in history.

                  2> The time in view, "that time," seems to be related

                        to the final resurrection.

      B. Two important principles.

          1) Daniel did not fully understand the vision.   12:8

          2) If Daniel 11 refers to the antichrist, then there will be

                many foreshadowings of his character.

              a) Many precursors of the antichrist have been taken to

                    be the final antichrist.     cf. 1 Jn 2:18

      C. Features of the antichrist in Daniel.

          1) His quest for autonomy.              11:36

              a) Echoes "you will be like God" from Garden of Eden.

          2) His blasphemy and inhumanity.        11:36

          3) He believes might makes right.       11:38

      D. The progress of the antichrist.      11:41-45

          1) Super-literalism is not required here.  (chariots, etc.)

              a) No need to make them tanks, either.

          2) King of the North prevails over the King of the South.

              a) His defeat is inauspicious.

              b) It is a devastating anticlimax to the progress of evil.

              c) In NT, Jesus defeats him with the breath of his mouth.

          3) The conflict is spiritual more than military.  (Eph 6:10ff)

              a) Purpose of chapter is to encourage Daniel to pray.



Copyright © 2024 by Rev. David Holwick

Created with the Freeware Edition of HelpNDoc: Easy CHM and documentation editor